Don’t Disparage the Mighty Eucalyptus

Do not cut these trees down!

Los Osos environmental activist Joey Racano weighs in on the controversy surrounding the Morro Coast Audubon Society’s plans to remove Eucalyptus trees from the Sweet Springs Nature Preserve.

As misunderstood as King Kong and standing nearly twice as tall, the Eucalyptus of California is alive and well, and living in Sweet Springs Nature Preserve. There are as many varieties of Eucalyptus as there are flavors at Baskin Robbins, with names like Blue Gum, Wooly Butt and Black Peppermint. As with many trees inhabiting present-day California, the Eucalyptus originated elsewhere, and some, like the Black Peppermint, grow taller in their native lands. There are some who disparage the mighty Eucalyptus, branding her an alien, an invasive, a weed to be eradicated. But like it or not, this tree is now part of our ecosystem, and causing us to redefine the word native.

According to the authoritative work “The Eucalyptus of California” by librarian/archivist Robert L. Santos, California State University, Stanislaus, Charlie Danielson of the California Native Plant Society once made the statement “No animal species feed on Eucalyptus.” But on a recent outing to Sweet Springs East, I personally observed and recorded a squirrel in one of the very trees marked for eradication, and it was eating Eucalyptus seeds! This throws into question how much the ecosystem would actually benefit from removal of these trees as compared to what these trees have come to provide.

Then there is the question of the Monarch butterfly, that solar powered two-winged riot of color that even now continue to be photographed in the very trees slated for removal. Cal Poly Graduate students have spent years documenting the Monarch butterfly’s use of the Eucalyptus in Los Osos and their movements among them. It is the opinion of these grad students that every Eucalyptus tree in the area is de facto critical habitat for these endangered butterflies.

In fact, of all the trees used by Monarch butterflies in California, a whopping 75% of them are Eucalyptus. The SLO County Land Conservancy in its very early days around 1998 wrote the “Sweet Springs Management Plan.” They had a Monarch specialist determine the Eucalyptus trees were used by the migrating Monarchs and that Sweet Springs was on the flyway for their migration. What are now left may be stragglers, but it is our job to bring them back.

In nearby Morro Bay, Eucalyptus make up an entire grove that serves year after year as a rookery for the Great Blue Heron, Black Crowned Night Heron, Great Egret and Cormorant. In Sweet Springs East, where this ill-conceived clearcut is proposed, species I have observed — using the trees in question — not only include Monarchs, but Admiral butterflies as well, along with squirrels, many hawks and a rather noisy Peregrine Falcon.

At Sweet Springs East, we are being given a chance to observe — first hand and up close — the process of evolution, where a once wholly invasive species is now used for food, shelter and comfort by native creatures. This evolutionary process carves itself a niche in the new and emerging ecosystem of the future. With the ongoing obliteration of our own native species, these trees may now provide an indispensable service many native California fauna can no longer do without.  At the time of this writing, the large canopies of the Eucalyptus at Sweet Springs are functioning as habitat and are the only trees left in the area large enough for owls, Red Tails and other large raptors to nest in. The proposed “restoration” plandoes nothing to replace those giant canopies whose usefulness would be lost forever. Due in part to the a natural course of events, but mainly to the heavy-handedness of man, Mother Earth is changing and will forever continue to change. The squirrel, the Monarch and the Eucalyptus have already embraced this change, and are leading us by natural example.If Morro Coast Audubon and the other organizations pushing for a clearcut as part of this project are really interested in removing invasive species so natives can have “their place” back, they will probably need to build a time machine. I suggest they start with a local program of voluntary palm tree removal, and perhaps hold a zebra fundraiser rodeo at Hearst Castle.

—Joey Racano

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/David-Duggan/100000491472709 David Duggan

    OK! I don’t see this project being stopped short of a law suit. I has it’s merits and it is a 10 year project. The handicap access gives it pluses as well as the native plant restoration. Raptor habitat is a problem. Ambitious to say the least. Mm…   

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1656637283 Joey Racano

    Dave, ten years of tromping in and out of that place hauling equipment will do plenty of damage in and of itself. and the extra cost of doing this proposed plan over the course of ten years as opposed to all at once virtually guarantees it couldn’t actually be done that way. There’s plenty of open area to do a restoration with all the bells and whistles without removing these large trees. Don’t forget the butterflies!

  • Pazu75

    Amazing article. I hope people get together and stop this craziness from happening.

  • gail lightfoot

    Someone, incuding Park Rangers giving up on rerouted creeks, streams, shifting sand, etc., said ‘You can’t fight Mother Nature’. Once established there has to be a damn [as my mother would say] good reason to attempt to circumvent nature. I don’t like Eucalyptus personally, they cause my nasal passages to congest and I know people who cannnot go near them because of allergies, but once in place the time and effort to remove anything not truly a serious problem is wasting the taxpayer’s money. People forget they have to pay for these projects. We do enough damage with our growth and development. No pint if doing even more damage to ‘save’ what is long gone.