Let’s Celebrate Accountability

UPDATE (4:36 PM): Dave Duggan posted some great quotes that give a lot of insight into what Celebrate Los Osos is all about.

On May 22, Celebrate Los Osos (CLO) is sponsoring the Back Bay Music Festival, which will have BBQ, beer, wine and free music — all for supposedly a good cause. Proceeds from the event will go toward beautification projects in Los Osos and Baywood Park. Months ago, I wrote an article about this volunteer organization and how the people involved have done more harm than good for people living in the Prohibition Zone. I’ve personally asked the founders of this volunteer organization to set up a fund for residents who would be unable to afford the upcoming sewer. There was no response. However, there was a response by founder Pandora Nash-Karner, which included public relations-inspired expressions like “spirit of volunteerism” and lines like, “Volunteering is the most fundamental act of citizenship and philanthropy in our society.”

Volunteering is the undertaking of responsibility. That responsibility is suppose to drive us to make our communities better for everyone. You can take a shovel, dig a hole, plant a tree in the middle of a busy intersection and “beautify” a town, but that will never undo the pain and suffering of thousands of homeowners who have fallen victim to the politics created by the people doing the digging. You can pave a boardwalk from one part of town to another and brag about it excessively to boost your political credentials, but that will never wipe away the self-inflicted shame of telling someone that they don’t matter because they didn’t do as much community service as you have (i.e. planting a tree).

After they have been scrutinized on The Razor, some people — including volunteers of CLO — have asked me, “What have you done for us lately?” in a vain attempt to establish a contrast between my altruistic efforts and theirs as the ultimate “Gotcha!” rebuttal. Apparently for some people, attending board meetings counts as “community service.” Who knew?

Community service is exactly what it sounds like. By performing community service, you’re helping the community — not to further your ambitions and indulgences. You volunteer because you simply want to help your friends, neighbors and community members. It’s not something to halfheartedly brag about as a means of elevating yourself over others. Community service isn’t meant to be used as a tool to replenish moral standing. And most importantly, community service should not be used as a flimsy charade to mask your crimes, poor judgments and prejudices.

In an e-mail to The Razor on October 23 of last year, Pandora Nash-Karner wrote, “We’re not just about the sewer issue.” The crippling legacy Nash-Karner left behind has caused thousands of residents to associate her likeness to the sewer and her irate, costly damnation of a community she once represented.

In the town of Los Osos, we have seen Nash-Karner non-profit organizations like Save the Dream and Celebrate Los Osos come and go. All of these organizations are given names that are fancy, beautified euphemisms for bad behavior and an unrelenting desire to remove the “riff-raff.”

Los Osos resident Jack Hunter shared an anecdote about at a Board of Supervisors meeting on April 30, 2009. Hunter talked about a former neighbor who spoke enthusiastically about benefiting from the plight of homeowners in the Prohibition Zone. Hunter’s former neighbor reportedly told him (likely paraphrased), “We’re going to make a sewer system so expensive that it would drive the riff-raff out of town. The beauty of it is they’ll all be forced to sell at the same time because of the price of – not just the sewer but – the water that will be priced upwards as well. That will put all their properties on the market at the same time. That will reduce the price. ‘We’ll buy those properties for a sum, we’ll scrape those cottages, we’ll recombine the lots and we’ll build mansions for the L.A. and San Francisco equity refugees.”

That neighbor was Leon Van Beurden, head of Bay Osos Brokers and one of the largest sponsors of Celebrate Los Osos. As a director of the Kiwanis Club of Los Osos, Van Beurden has advocated the banishment of members and guests who’ve opposed past and present wastewater treatment projects.

The Kiwanis Club’s past president, Peter Starlings, is also a major sponsor of Celebrate Los Osos. In early 2005, Starlings instructed all the realtors working at his business (Johnson Starlings & Associates) to inform potential buyers that the total cost of the sewer assessment was only $4,000. This was used as a means of luring clients into using his realtors and services. Starlings also attended the hearings that challenged the legality of Measure B. At one hearing in October 2005, Starlings told the then-recalled Los Osos Community Services District President Stan Gustafson that “the district and the people supporting the recall [nearly 3,500 people] deserve to fail.”

Century 21 Hometown Reality’s Jerry Gregory, another leading sponsor of Celebrate Los Osos, joined Nash-Karner in 2005 to chide the district for the recall and to advocate enforcement action for Prohibition Zone residents.

Several of the sponsors are realtors who would significantly benefit from the elimination of the “riff-raff.” Neither of these men have apologized for their words and actions — and there’s no reason to expect them to, but you can expect them to plant some trees and pretend that nothing ever happened.

Though they aren’t sponsors, many of CLO’s volunteers such as Joyce Albright, Don Bearden, Jan DiLeo, Sharon Fredericks, Bill Garfinkel, Jan Harper, Maria Kelly, Alon Perlman, Bob Semenson and Lynette Tornatzky have widened the political divide in Los Osos by taking all the steps necessary to ensure social and economic turmoil for residents (the “riff-raff”) who will likely be taxed out of their homes. These people may plant trees, redesign a road medium and pave a boardwalk, but they want you to fail. They want you to recognize their efforts as a way of justifying their resentment for you.

The most well-known supporters of the County’s $165 million (and rising) wastewater project belong to organizations like Celebrate Los Osos, which — on the surface — appear to have laudable goals. They want to “beautify” the town while — as of May 10 — there are 72 foreclosures in Los Osos. Water rates are increasing (such as the proposed rate hikes by Golden State Water, which include a 48% increase in the monthly water bill for 2011). In California, 13% of the labor force is unemployed and the rate is rising. The monthly sewer costs without financing are expected to go beyond the initial rate of $250/month. Seawater intrusion remains a critical threat to the groundwater basin. The town remains as divided as ever. Thank you, Celebrate Los Osos.

– Aaron Ochs

  • David Duggan

    Do you remember…

    I hope the CSD gets fined out of existence fast enough to save the contractors and the low-interest loan!
    Pandora

    Please carry out your warning of fines. Los Osos residents need to face reality. I have, and hope that your fines will result in the dissolution of the CSD and the uninterrupted construction of the current wastewater plant.
    Richard S. Sargent

    We also plan to enforce against the individual dischargers – the septic system owners.
    Roger Briggs

    I am encouraging the Regional Water Quality Control Board to pursue fining the Los Osos CSD and who ever else need be.
    Thank you for your time and consideration
    James F. Godfrey,

    Please let the community know that this is the RWQB’s line in the sand. Step beyond it and they bring the entire community down around them and there will be no one to blame but themselves. Please tell them that they have run out of choices.
    Respectfuly,
    Nancy Leslie

    I am asking you to please put this issue once again on your agenda and move swiftly to enforce the sanctions against the LOCSD and the individual dischargers as well.
    Gail Smith-Deegan

    Having said that, I think your office should be both swift and brutal with enforcement action against my town.
    Sincerely,
    Francisco Focha

    So I don’t know if I personally will be able to attend, but I plan to have the enforcement in front of their noses in black and white. They will hopefully consider the cumulative effect of pending civil liabilities from us, damages from the contractors, sunk cost in the project (over $25M?), pay back of loan payments to the State Board with interest, additional inflation costs for a project that they haven’t defined at some unknown site (and I’m sure some other ramifications), and come to their senses.
    We also plan to enforce against the individual dischargers – the septic system owners.It’s too bad your community is doing this to itself.
    Roger W. Briggs PE
    Executive Officer
    Central Coast Regional Board

    I have felt for some time that individual accountability for septic systems would be the only way to erode the support of the anti-sewer group. This is a hard pill for me to prescribe, since I personally will have to swallow it, but I think each and every septic system in the community should be condemned outright. That would do the trick… … Make it personally urgent and they will come around…or leave.
    Michael

    As much as I hate to say it (being a property owner), I think it should include action against individual property owners.
    Thank you,
    Martha Neder

    My honest opinon is that your fine is large enough to bankrupt the CSD and place all of the services back in the hands of the County. I know they will move forward with this project
    Thank you,
    Jerry Gregory

    Celebrate, celebrate, dance to the music.

    • Aaron

      As always, nice catch, Dave.

    • Piper Reilly

      Looks like Los Olivos may be installing a STEP system to solve their nitrate/density issues due to its affordability and effectiveness. On Thursday, the RWQCB will probably grant continuing waivers to both the Goleta and the Santa Barbara sewer plants to put primary and secondary treated waste into the ocean. The rational is that the cost for upgrading is too high so they are being forgiven their blatant pollution, just like San Diego and Morro Bay.

      Mean while Los Osos, with a total average nitrate level 1% over drinking water standards, (still – no real change for decades), and current tests showing no pollution in the back bay over allowable standards, is subject to fines, ($5,00.00 per day retroactive to 1983 for 4,500 plus homes – potentially 160 BILLION dollars worth…).

      If that’s not enough Los Osos’ “prohibition zone” is being forced, (no real competiton), to install a guaranteed to leak, (see the fine screening report), MWH, (under investigation in 3 states for bid rigging and accounting issues), gravity system. Los Osos is an RWQCB no discharge zone. Can you say double standard and underhanded, dirty politics? Or perhaps just economic cleansing of a coastal community. Either way it is morally and environmentally wrong.

  • David Duggan

    Do you remember…

    I hope the CSD gets fined out of existence fast enough to save the contractors and the low-interest loan!
    Pandora

    Please carry out your warning of fines. Los Osos residents need to face reality. I have, and hope that your fines will result in the dissolution of the CSD and the uninterrupted construction of the current wastewater plant.
    Richard S. Sargent

    We also plan to enforce against the individual dischargers – the septic system owners.
    Roger Briggs

    I am encouraging the Regional Water Quality Control Board to pursue fining the Los Osos CSD and who ever else need be.
    Thank you for your time and consideration
    James F. Godfrey,

    Please let the community know that this is the RWQB’s line in the sand. Step beyond it and they bring the entire community down around them and there will be no one to blame but themselves. Please tell them that they have run out of choices.
    Respectfuly,
    Nancy Leslie

    I am asking you to please put this issue once again on your agenda and move swiftly to enforce the sanctions against the LOCSD and the individual dischargers as well.
    Gail Smith-Deegan

    Having said that, I think your office should be both swift and brutal with enforcement action against my town.
    Sincerely,
    Francisco Focha

    So I don’t know if I personally will be able to attend, but I plan to have the enforcement in front of their noses in black and white. They will hopefully consider the cumulative effect of pending civil liabilities from us, damages from the contractors, sunk cost in the project (over $25M?), pay back of loan payments to the State Board with interest, additional inflation costs for a project that they haven’t defined at some unknown site (and I’m sure some other ramifications), and come to their senses.
    We also plan to enforce against the individual dischargers – the septic system owners.It’s too bad your community is doing this to itself.
    Roger W. Briggs PE
    Executive Officer
    Central Coast Regional Board

    I have felt for some time that individual accountability for septic systems would be the only way to erode the support of the anti-sewer group. This is a hard pill for me to prescribe, since I personally will have to swallow it, but I think each and every septic system in the community should be condemned outright. That would do the trick… … Make it personally urgent and they will come around…or leave.
    Michael

    As much as I hate to say it (being a property owner), I think it should include action against individual property owners.
    Thank you,
    Martha Neder

    My honest opinon is that your fine is large enough to bankrupt the CSD and place all of the services back in the hands of the County. I know they will move forward with this project
    Thank you,
    Jerry Gregory

    Celebrate, celebrate, dance to the music.

    • Aaron

      As always, nice catch, Dave.

    • Piper Reilly

      Looks like Los Olivos may be installing a STEP system to solve their nitrate/density issues due to its affordability and effectiveness. On Thursday, the RWQCB will probably grant continuing waivers to both the Goleta and the Santa Barbara sewer plants to put primary and secondary treated waste into the ocean. The rational is that the cost for upgrading is too high so they are being forgiven their blatant pollution, just like San Diego and Morro Bay.

      Mean while Los Osos, with a total average nitrate level 1% over drinking water standards, (still – no real change for decades), and current tests showing no pollution in the back bay over allowable standards, is subject to fines, ($5,00.00 per day retroactive to 1983 for 4,500 plus homes – potentially 160 BILLION dollars worth…).

      If that’s not enough Los Osos’ “prohibition zone” is being forced, (no real competiton), to install a guaranteed to leak, (see the fine screening report), MWH, (under investigation in 3 states for bid rigging and accounting issues), gravity system. Los Osos is an RWQCB no discharge zone. Can you say double standard and underhanded, dirty politics? Or perhaps just economic cleansing of a coastal community. Either way it is morally and environmentally wrong.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Let’s Celebrate Accountability | The Razor Online -- Topsy.com

  • Ho-Chee

    Very good article, Aaron! And kudos to Dave for digging up all the comments . I had NO IDEA that we live in such a “LOVING COMMUNITY”! Whatever happened to what I was taught, “Love thy neighbor”?

  • Ho-Chee

    Very good article, Aaron! And kudos to Dave for digging up all the comments . I had NO IDEA that we live in such a “LOVING COMMUNITY”! Whatever happened to what I was taught, “Love thy neighbor”?

  • Ru4REAL

    I am absolutely stunned! It appears as though ALL the real estate “PROFESSIONALS” we have in our Community are totally UNETHICAL & without any morals whatsoever. I am surprised that NO ONE has filed a complaint against ANY (or ALL) of them with the CA Dept. of Real Estate. There are LAWS that each licensed real estate “professional” MUST adhere to, such as no ‘back dating of contracts’, failing to disclose MATERIAL FACT,etc. & the list goes on & on, but the big issue here is that NONE of them ever DISCLOSED THE SEWER or THE PROPOSED COST. I know for a fact that John Sarwein had listings in which he NEVER MENTIONED that the septics would HAVE to be replaced by a SEWER. I think I can even put my hands on the contract HE wrote up. Maybe, I need to send a copy to the DRE & file a complaint with the Commissioner. I invite others to do the same. It’s about time those of us living in the PZ are “made whole” again.

  • Ru4REAL

    I am absolutely stunned! It appears as though ALL the real estate “PROFESSIONALS” we have in our Community are totally UNETHICAL & without any morals whatsoever. I am surprised that NO ONE has filed a complaint against ANY (or ALL) of them with the CA Dept. of Real Estate. There are LAWS that each licensed real estate “professional” MUST adhere to, such as no ‘back dating of contracts’, failing to disclose MATERIAL FACT,etc. & the list goes on & on, but the big issue here is that NONE of them ever DISCLOSED THE SEWER or THE PROPOSED COST. I know for a fact that John Sarwein had listings in which he NEVER MENTIONED that the septics would HAVE to be replaced by a SEWER. I think I can even put my hands on the contract HE wrote up. Maybe, I need to send a copy to the DRE & file a complaint with the Commissioner. I invite others to do the same. It’s about time those of us living in the PZ are “made whole” again.

  • Richard LeGros

    Aaron,

    Whatever you think about a few select volunteers involved in Celebrate Los Osos (CLO), they ARE doing something CONSTRUCTIVE for Los Osos. Why marginalize good deeds?

    I also appreciate the good deeds resulting from community efforts by those that I politically disagree with. The fund-raising efforts for the homeless (to which I contributed) comes to mind. Though I have misgivings about the politics of many of the folks involved in that effort, I placed those feelings aside for the betterment of the community.

    Do you not appreciate the value to the community resulting from the projects that the CLO and those assisting the homeless have undertaken and built; all achieved at no cost to you? Why not accept and support all volunteer efforts to better Los Osos regardless of the political leanings of the volunteers involved?

    • Aaron

      Richard,

      I figured you would say I was “marginalizing” the volunteer work — and you’re right, I am, because the efforts we’re seeing are marginal compared to what these people have done previously. Contrary to the assumption that I’m simply ridiculing people for doing good deeds, I’m saying that these good deeds and not equitable to the bad deeds that affected nearly the entire community.

      Something that would be equitable to the damage done would be to host a fundraiser at the South Bay Community Center to create an assistance fund for low-income homeowners who cannot afford the sewer costs. If I saw an event like that, I wouldn’t chastise Celebrate Los Osos.

      Here’s an analogy that explains my position on this. Let’s say I’m the head of one of the nation’s largest financial institutions. Knowing that I was trading bad loans, risky derivatives and faulty credit default swaps, I secretly bet on the housing crash without taking measures to prevent it. Without admitting any wrongdoing, I send out a memo to my customers — most of them gave me a generous portion of the recent $700 billion bailout — and I say to them, “To show my appreciation for my customers, I’m going to landscape a garden right in front of our corporate offices so it beautifies the environment.” I later tote the fact that I did it for community service. Not so fast. That doesn’t do anything to help disadvantaged homeowners who are suffering because of my actions. But there’s some nice trees planted in my garden. They are all coconut! So what have you done for me lately?

      Regarding the volunteers themselves, if the volunteers didn’t egregiously expand their political ideologies to the detriment of others, then there wouldn’t be much of a discussion. If the volunteers committed to helping out the community because they wanted to help and they had nothing to politically gain from it — or if they never intended to use it as a scale to decide who’s more worthy and righteous — then everything would be peachy, but that’s not the case. There are a lot of volunteers who I didn’t talk about because they do community service for the right reasons and they don’t use it as political capital to exert authority over opposing beliefs like the Spanish Inquisition.

      If people’s community involvement were simply limited to political leanings, then there wouldn’t be an issue, but advocating the exile of middle-class and low-income homeowners (the “riff-raff”) goes beyond political or partisan differences in opinion. When these people advocate such actions and exploit the system to make it happen — then to expect us to respect them and submit to them for “beautifying” the community they helped divide and conquer — I can’t help but find those people to be extremely disingenuous and classless.

  • Richard LeGros

    Aaron,

    Whatever you think about a few select volunteers involved in Celebrate Los Osos (CLO), they ARE doing something CONSTRUCTIVE for Los Osos. Why marginalize good deeds?

    I also appreciate the good deeds resulting from community efforts by those that I politically disagree with. The fund-raising efforts for the homeless (to which I contributed) comes to mind. Though I have misgivings about the politics of many of the folks involved in that effort, I placed those feelings aside for the betterment of the community.

    Do you not appreciate the value to the community resulting from the projects that the CLO and those assisting the homeless have undertaken and built; all achieved at no cost to you? Why not accept and support all volunteer efforts to better Los Osos regardless of the political leanings of the volunteers involved?

    • Aaron

      Richard,

      I figured you would say I was “marginalizing” the volunteer work — and you’re right, I am, because the efforts we’re seeing are marginal compared to what these people have done previously. Contrary to the assumption that I’m simply ridiculing people for doing good deeds, I’m saying that these good deeds and not equitable to the bad deeds that affected nearly the entire community.

      Something that would be equitable to the damage done would be to host a fundraiser at the South Bay Community Center to create an assistance fund for low-income homeowners who cannot afford the sewer costs. If I saw an event like that, I wouldn’t chastise Celebrate Los Osos.

      Here’s an analogy that explains my position on this. Let’s say I’m the head of one of the nation’s largest financial institutions. Knowing that I was trading bad loans, risky derivatives and faulty credit default swaps, I secretly bet on the housing crash without taking measures to prevent it. Without admitting any wrongdoing, I send out a memo to my customers — most of them gave me a generous portion of the recent $700 billion bailout — and I say to them, “To show my appreciation for my customers, I’m going to landscape a garden right in front of our corporate offices so it beautifies the environment.” I later tote the fact that I did it for community service. Not so fast. That doesn’t do anything to help disadvantaged homeowners who are suffering because of my actions. But there’s some nice trees planted in my garden. They are all coconut! So what have you done for me lately?

      Regarding the volunteers themselves, if the volunteers didn’t egregiously expand their political ideologies to the detriment of others, then there wouldn’t be much of a discussion. If the volunteers committed to helping out the community because they wanted to help and they had nothing to politically gain from it — or if they never intended to use it as a scale to decide who’s more worthy and righteous — then everything would be peachy, but that’s not the case. There are a lot of volunteers who I didn’t talk about because they do community service for the right reasons and they don’t use it as political capital to exert authority over opposing beliefs like the Spanish Inquisition.

      If people’s community involvement were simply limited to political leanings, then there wouldn’t be an issue, but advocating the exile of middle-class and low-income homeowners (the “riff-raff”) goes beyond political or partisan differences in opinion. When these people advocate such actions and exploit the system to make it happen — then to expect us to respect them and submit to them for “beautifying” the community they helped divide and conquer — I can’t help but find those people to be extremely disingenuous and classless.

  • Richard LeGros

    Aaron,

    Regardless of your opinion about some of the folks in CLO, you cannot dismiss the positive affects of their work. Why not embrace and encourage such positive works as they are helping to heal Los Osos. Regardless of which political side of the aisle the work comes from, such positive contributions to the community should be celebrated.

    There is really no need to demonize folks; or seperate folks into’ haves and have nots’; right versus wrong. What matters is the Los Osos resolve it’s problems constructively with no one left out in the cold.

    You have outlined what you believe to be an issue….assisting those that will need help to pay for the future sewer. This is a noble quest; so why not be the one to spearhead such a fundraiser? Why are you waiting for others to do the work? I have to point out that if you really believe in such a goal, then insulting your neigbors that could help you is not very constructive. You will be suprised at how hard folks will work towards such a goal regardless of their politics if treated positively.

    • Aaron

      Richard,

      Again, I’m not dismissing what these people have done nor am I stating that we they do doesn’t matter. I’m saying that the people — that I’ve talked about in my article — commit to community service that is minute in scale compared to the negative effects of their actions. Then they use their volunteerism as a means of presuming authority and dominion over opposing views and disagreements.

      I’m just trying to be as clear as possible on this, but something is getting lost in translation.

      Thank you for suggesting that I should spearhead a fundraiser. Duly noted.

      Couple of things.

      I haven’t e-mailed Roger Briggs and the RWQCB to tell them that the district and the community should be fined out of existence. I didn’t instruct the realtors I work with to tell potential home buyers that their assessment for a sewer was only $4,000. I’m not the one salivating over the premise that the riff-raff needs to go. I don’t kick or prevent people from participating community organizations that I belong to simply because I disagree with them.

      I believe CLO is much more qualified to spearhead a fundraiser. I think that would be terrific. I would promote it. I would encourage people to go. I would love to see something like that happen. That would be a win-win situation for everybody.

      For your sake, let’s have another hypothetical. Let’s say I spearhead a fundraiser right now. You say that I’m insulting my neighbors that could help me on my “noble quest,” but what if I told you that the very same “neighbors” — that you’re talking about — have not once shown the intent to conduct such a fundraiser for as long as this sewer saga has been going on? I could boil it down to the fact that many of these “neighbors” have shown no remorse and no inclination to redeem themselves. Normally when it comes to community service, you shouldn’t exclude anyone, but let me ask you this: why should I seek out people that really don’t want to help? I could always find people on the street who would be more than happy to lend a hand. Why should I go out of my way to specifically recruit people who don’t want to help other people?

      Richard, a lot of people are going to be left out in cold. You know that as well as I do. That’s why the people of CLO need to mitigate the social and financial impacts of PZ residents first before beautifying the environment. I would love to walk on the boardwalk from Baywood Park to Sweet Springs if I could afford living in town. Who wouldn’t?

  • Richard LeGros

    Aaron,

    Regardless of your opinion about some of the folks in CLO, you cannot dismiss the positive affects of their work. Why not embrace and encourage such positive works as they are helping to heal Los Osos. Regardless of which political side of the aisle the work comes from, such positive contributions to the community should be celebrated.

    There is really no need to demonize folks; or seperate folks into’ haves and have nots’; right versus wrong. What matters is the Los Osos resolve it’s problems constructively with no one left out in the cold.

    You have outlined what you believe to be an issue….assisting those that will need help to pay for the future sewer. This is a noble quest; so why not be the one to spearhead such a fundraiser? Why are you waiting for others to do the work? I have to point out that if you really believe in such a goal, then insulting your neigbors that could help you is not very constructive. You will be suprised at how hard folks will work towards such a goal regardless of their politics if treated positively.

    • Aaron

      Richard,

      Again, I’m not dismissing what these people have done nor am I stating that we they do doesn’t matter. I’m saying that the people — that I’ve talked about in my article — commit to community service that is minute in scale compared to the negative effects of their actions. Then they use their volunteerism as a means of presuming authority and dominion over opposing views and disagreements.

      I’m just trying to be as clear as possible on this, but something is getting lost in translation.

      Thank you for suggesting that I should spearhead a fundraiser. Duly noted.

      Couple of things.

      I haven’t e-mailed Roger Briggs and the RWQCB to tell them that the district and the community should be fined out of existence. I didn’t instruct the realtors I work with to tell potential home buyers that their assessment for a sewer was only $4,000. I’m not the one salivating over the premise that the riff-raff needs to go. I don’t kick or prevent people from participating community organizations that I belong to simply because I disagree with them.

      I believe CLO is much more qualified to spearhead a fundraiser. I think that would be terrific. I would promote it. I would encourage people to go. I would love to see something like that happen. That would be a win-win situation for everybody.

      For your sake, let’s have another hypothetical. Let’s say I spearhead a fundraiser right now. You say that I’m insulting my neighbors that could help me on my “noble quest,” but what if I told you that the very same “neighbors” — that you’re talking about — have not once shown the intent to conduct such a fundraiser for as long as this sewer saga has been going on? I could boil it down to the fact that many of these “neighbors” have shown no remorse and no inclination to redeem themselves. Normally when it comes to community service, you shouldn’t exclude anyone, but let me ask you this: why should I seek out people that really don’t want to help? I could always find people on the street who would be more than happy to lend a hand. Why should I go out of my way to specifically recruit people who don’t want to help other people?

      Richard, a lot of people are going to be left out in cold. You know that as well as I do. That’s why the people of CLO need to mitigate the social and financial impacts of PZ residents first before beautifying the environment. I would love to walk on the boardwalk from Baywood Park to Sweet Springs if I could afford living in town. Who wouldn’t?

  • David Duggan

    Wow! It is what it is. That’s why small town politics are like a shoot out at the O.K. Corral or a bar fight. It can be vicious and it’s never ever pretty. It’s a territorial prerogative with everyone claiming an exclusive right and a special privilege to do as they will in the name of the people. That’s why we have elections so we can, if the people have the will, throw the bums out if we the people can’t appreciate their service. Yes we have unelected autocrats in positions that seem to give them unassailable power. So whaddya gonna do? Sometimes they”ll either trip themselves up or just fade away. But more often than not they’ll do their damage and hand over the proverbial baton to a protege. It’s hard to break the cycle but not impossible. Someone has just got to get a foot in the door and hopefully it’ll take. Just remember that some of these ‘good old boy’ networks are referred to as “dynasties.” Scary ain’t it.

    But don’t get me wrong. Most of these people think their doing something good and most of the time they are. But sometimes, well meaning or not, some of these people, on both sides of an issues, can be a community’s worst nightmare. And that’s just a fact Jack.

    And all I want to do is dance.

  • David Duggan

    Wow! It is what it is. That’s why small town politics are like a shoot out at the O.K. Corral or a bar fight. It can be vicious and it’s never ever pretty. It’s a territorial prerogative with everyone claiming an exclusive right and a special privilege to do as they will in the name of the people. That’s why we have elections so we can, if the people have the will, throw the bums out if we the people can’t appreciate their service. Yes we have unelected autocrats in positions that seem to give them unassailable power. So whaddya gonna do? Sometimes they”ll either trip themselves up or just fade away. But more often than not they’ll do their damage and hand over the proverbial baton to a protege. It’s hard to break the cycle but not impossible. Someone has just got to get a foot in the door and hopefully it’ll take. Just remember that some of these ‘good old boy’ networks are referred to as “dynasties.” Scary ain’t it.

    But don’t get me wrong. Most of these people think their doing something good and most of the time they are. But sometimes, well meaning or not, some of these people, on both sides of an issues, can be a community’s worst nightmare. And that’s just a fact Jack.

    And all I want to do is dance.

  • Richard LeGros

    But Aaron, there have been past efforts to raise funds to assist ‘disadantanged’ PZ home owners; many of them involving the very folks you are trying to marginalize as uncaring or willing to help.

    For example, the Low Income Assistance Trust Fund was set up by the LOCSD in 2002 at the behest of Rose Bowker, Pandora Nash-Karner, and others; and has raised over $200,000. Of that $200,000, $20,000 was donated by Hank Watterworth, $100,000 by the MB National Estuary, and the remainder consisting of many small private donations from many citizens (including myself).

    Poo-pooing the good works achieved by folks you want to ‘blame and shame’, is not constructive or helps Los Osos heal itself. Whatever you opinion of these folks, the fact of the matter is that they are DOING SOMETHING CONSTRUCTIVE FOR LOS OSOS. Be joyous that they are doing so. Better yet, you could consider volunteering for CLO projects as they need help; and I am sure that your suggestion about a fundraiser would be well received too.

    • Aaron

      Richard,

      I’ve heard of the Low Income Assistance Trust Fund, but what ever happened to it? If the fund is still active, how come residents don’t know about it — especially now that we’re in an economic recession and people need financial assistance more than ever?

      I’ve been criticized for my arguments because some believe it’s not “constructive” for Los Osos. If the community of Los Osos had a population so small that everyone I mentioned in that article were the only people living in town, then sure, it wouldn’t be constructive for me to post these articles — but the fact of the matter is that I talked about the political and real estate heavyweights and politicos who make up less than one percent of the community. I’m not talking about the 99% of the community, but they need to know what’s going on.

      Thank you for suggesting that I should volunteer for CLO, but my points remain the same. In order for me to be joyous about any constructive efforts, I need to see people actively fighting for the middle and fixed income residents and not against them. Planting trees, paving boardwalks and mentioning those accomplishments ad nauseum in the Bay News doesn’t exactly help people who are struggling financially. Could my words be construed as “poo-pooing” good works by people? Not really. Doing those things is “good” but it’s not equitable to the damage done by them — and that’s why the people I’ve mentioned need to do something for the greater good.

  • Richard LeGros

    But Aaron, there have been past efforts to raise funds to assist ‘disadantanged’ PZ home owners; many of them involving the very folks you are trying to marginalize as uncaring or willing to help.

    For example, the Low Income Assistance Trust Fund was set up by the LOCSD in 2002 at the behest of Rose Bowker, Pandora Nash-Karner, and others; and has raised over $200,000. Of that $200,000, $20,000 was donated by Hank Watterworth, $100,000 by the MB National Estuary, and the remainder consisting of many small private donations from many citizens (including myself).

    Poo-pooing the good works achieved by folks you want to ‘blame and shame’, is not constructive or helps Los Osos heal itself. Whatever you opinion of these folks, the fact of the matter is that they are DOING SOMETHING CONSTRUCTIVE FOR LOS OSOS. Be joyous that they are doing so. Better yet, you could consider volunteering for CLO projects as they need help; and I am sure that your suggestion about a fundraiser would be well received too.

    • Aaron

      Richard,

      I’ve heard of the Low Income Assistance Trust Fund, but what ever happened to it? If the fund is still active, how come residents don’t know about it — especially now that we’re in an economic recession and people need financial assistance more than ever?

      I’ve been criticized for my arguments because some believe it’s not “constructive” for Los Osos. If the community of Los Osos had a population so small that everyone I mentioned in that article were the only people living in town, then sure, it wouldn’t be constructive for me to post these articles — but the fact of the matter is that I talked about the political and real estate heavyweights and politicos who make up less than one percent of the community. I’m not talking about the 99% of the community, but they need to know what’s going on.

      Thank you for suggesting that I should volunteer for CLO, but my points remain the same. In order for me to be joyous about any constructive efforts, I need to see people actively fighting for the middle and fixed income residents and not against them. Planting trees, paving boardwalks and mentioning those accomplishments ad nauseum in the Bay News doesn’t exactly help people who are struggling financially. Could my words be construed as “poo-pooing” good works by people? Not really. Doing those things is “good” but it’s not equitable to the damage done by them — and that’s why the people I’ve mentioned need to do something for the greater good.

  • Bev. De Witt-Moylan

    The families randomly chosen in 2006 for prosecution who hold CCRWQCB enforcement orders face “septic” accountability right now, not at some yet to be designated future date when sewer charges will begin. For the second time in three years we are required to pump our septic tanks, a burden no other Los Osos family has had to shoulder. The 46 households randomly chosen as test cases over four years ago continue to carry the CCRWQCB enforcement burden for the entire community.

    Yet not one candidate for public office has ever approached any CCRWQCB enforcement order recipient we know to ask us about our orders or how how we are managing.

    Many Los Osos families are struggling. Within that group are those families who endured the significant impact of CCRWQCB compliance charges on our family budgets three years ago and who endure them again this year. RIGHT NOW. None of those who have criticized or ridiculed or pitied us has made a move to assist us.

    None of those who described us as theatrical or dramatic whiners facing consequences no different from NOV recipients ever accepted our public offers to assume our CDO to test their theories.

    The water board has yet to respond to our repeated requests for data regarding the effect on the waters of the state of a mere 46 families in this town complying with enforcement orders after over four years of prosecution and over three years of execution. We, on the other hand, can cite to the penny the fiscal impact of compliance. Less exact are the social/emotional and physical tolls this prosecution and these orders have taken on us and on our families.

    Most cynical of all is the water board’s assertion that the enforcement orders become null and void upon the sale of our property, rendering their prosecution moot. An empty exercise.

    Yet another death has occurred in our ranks leaving an ill widow in her mid-eighties to cope alone with the CCRWQCB. No one outside our tiny group has stepped forward to assist her. No candidate for public office, nor anyone who has criticized us for defending ourselves has asked her how she is doing or what she needs, or offered any assistance at all. To my mind that would be community service.

    • Aaron

      Hi Bev,

      I just wanted to welcome you to the site and thank you for your comments. Very insightful and well-written.

      Some people see enforcement action simply as a way of getting into compliance with water standards, regulations and laws. What people don’t understand is that a lot of people are affected by this outcome socially, physically, mentally, financially and spiritually — so when someone says that the Prohibition Zone should be “fined out of existence,” you can easily say, “Sure, that was said in 2005 by someone who was just upset over the results of the recall,” but we are living the consequences — and we have to bear those consequences because of the untested assertion that all septic tanks in the PZ are discharging into the groundwater.

      I want to bring this back to Celebrate Los Osos for a moment because I see a very starling, emotional disconnect between the movers, the shakers of this organization and the emotional impact of the CCRWQCB’s enforcement orders. I get this feeling that they want to distance themselves from taking responsibility for what they’ve said, done and openly encouraged. I visualize this image of looking at Pandora Nash-Karner right in the eyes and asking her in a very non-confrontational manner, “Why are you ignoring us?” Why is it more important to beautify a town on the outside than to beautify a town from the inside? I’ve been looking for an answer for several years, but I’ve been deferred to PR-crafted responses that never address personal responsibility. It’s like I’m interacting with a corporation disguised as a group of human beings.

      What would it take to get people to understand — and objectively respond to — what has happened for the past three years without carrying the predisposition that we’re “nuts” and “loons”? What will it take for people to realize that there is suffering and it’s actually not some callous, political ploy with a laundry list of ulterior motives?

  • Bev. De Witt-Moylan

    The families randomly chosen in 2006 for prosecution who hold CCRWQCB enforcement orders face “septic” accountability right now, not at some yet to be designated future date when sewer charges will begin. For the second time in three years we are required to pump our septic tanks, a burden no other Los Osos family has had to shoulder. The 46 households randomly chosen as test cases over four years ago continue to carry the CCRWQCB enforcement burden for the entire community.

    Yet not one candidate for public office has ever approached any CCRWQCB enforcement order recipient we know to ask us about our orders or how how we are managing.

    Many Los Osos families are struggling. Within that group are those families who endured the significant impact of CCRWQCB compliance charges on our family budgets three years ago and who endure them again this year. RIGHT NOW. None of those who have criticized or ridiculed or pitied us has made a move to assist us.

    None of those who described us as theatrical or dramatic whiners facing consequences no different from NOV recipients ever accepted our public offers to assume our CDO to test their theories.

    The water board has yet to respond to our repeated requests for data regarding the effect on the waters of the state of a mere 46 families in this town complying with enforcement orders after over four years of prosecution and over three years of execution. We, on the other hand, can cite to the penny the fiscal impact of compliance. Less exact are the social/emotional and physical tolls this prosecution and these orders have taken on us and on our families.

    Most cynical of all is the water board’s assertion that the enforcement orders become null and void upon the sale of our property, rendering their prosecution moot. An empty exercise.

    Yet another death has occurred in our ranks leaving an ill widow in her mid-eighties to cope alone with the CCRWQCB. No one outside our tiny group has stepped forward to assist her. No candidate for public office, nor anyone who has criticized us for defending ourselves has asked her how she is doing or what she needs, or offered any assistance at all. To my mind that would be community service.

    • Aaron

      Hi Bev,

      I just wanted to welcome you to the site and thank you for your comments. Very insightful and well-written.

      Some people see enforcement action simply as a way of getting into compliance with water standards, regulations and laws. What people don’t understand is that a lot of people are affected by this outcome socially, physically, mentally, financially and spiritually — so when someone says that the Prohibition Zone should be “fined out of existence,” you can easily say, “Sure, that was said in 2005 by someone who was just upset over the results of the recall,” but we are living the consequences — and we have to bear those consequences because of the untested assertion that all septic tanks in the PZ are discharging into the groundwater.

      I want to bring this back to Celebrate Los Osos for a moment because I see a very starling, emotional disconnect between the movers, the shakers of this organization and the emotional impact of the CCRWQCB’s enforcement orders. I get this feeling that they want to distance themselves from taking responsibility for what they’ve said, done and openly encouraged. I visualize this image of looking at Pandora Nash-Karner right in the eyes and asking her in a very non-confrontational manner, “Why are you ignoring us?” Why is it more important to beautify a town on the outside than to beautify a town from the inside? I’ve been looking for an answer for several years, but I’ve been deferred to PR-crafted responses that never address personal responsibility. It’s like I’m interacting with a corporation disguised as a group of human beings.

      What would it take to get people to understand — and objectively respond to — what has happened for the past three years without carrying the predisposition that we’re “nuts” and “loons”? What will it take for people to realize that there is suffering and it’s actually not some callous, political ploy with a laundry list of ulterior motives?

  • Ho-Chee

    So Bev, do you still think that Gail & Shaunna did a good job for you & the other 45? Personally, I think Gail’s unwanted “involvement” has made the situation in the PZ much worse in many respects. She has made far more enemy’s for us in the County than we had before.

    • David Duggan

      Ho-Chee? Is that name from Star Trek the Next Generation?

      Putting blame Gail and Shanna is like trying to put blame on Pandora and (cute as a bug) Jan DiLeo. Everyone who has had a hand in this issue has had good intentions. Right or wrong the road to perdition is paved with good intention. Or no good deed goes unpunished if your trying to punish those who try to make a difference. Do you truly believe that the community has enemies in the County because of the act’s of a few who are exercising there rights under the law. If that’s true then shouldn’t we be directing our concern to those in the County who think they need to punish the Community because of the few who are exercising their rights.

      The following is what I get from your statement.

      It kinda reminds me of the 60′s when civil rights activist were targeted for helping people exercise their voting rights. Rights are rights under the law and as then the ‘Good Old Boy Network’ as I understand what you’re trying to imply, is not beyond using red-baiting type tactics in their attempts to discredit those who choose to speak out. And they’re not beyond using social and economic tactics in an attempt stop people from exercising their rights.

      And you say, “…far more enemy’s (sic) for us in the County than we had before.” What enemies did the community have before and for what reasons? Don’t get me wrong. I’m not trying to gain say your statements. I’m just trying to understand the mind set.

  • Ho-Chee

    So Bev, do you still think that Gail & Shaunna did a good job for you & the other 45? Personally, I think Gail’s unwanted “involvement” has made the situation in the PZ much worse in many respects. She has made far more enemy’s for us in the County than we had before.

    • David Duggan

      Ho-Chee? Is that name from Star Trek the Next Generation?

      Putting blame Gail and Shanna is like trying to put blame on Pandora and (cute as a bug) Jan DiLeo. Everyone who has had a hand in this issue has had good intentions. Right or wrong the road to perdition is paved with good intention. Or no good deed goes unpunished if your trying to punish those who try to make a difference. Do you truly believe that the community has enemies in the County because of the act’s of a few who are exercising there rights under the law. If that’s true then shouldn’t we be directing our concern to those in the County who think they need to punish the Community because of the few who are exercising their rights.

      The following is what I get from your statement.

      It kinda reminds me of the 60′s when civil rights activist were targeted for helping people exercise their voting rights. Rights are rights under the law and as then the ‘Good Old Boy Network’ as I understand what you’re trying to imply, is not beyond using red-baiting type tactics in their attempts to discredit those who choose to speak out. And they’re not beyond using social and economic tactics in an attempt stop people from exercising their rights.

      And you say, “…far more enemy’s (sic) for us in the County than we had before.” What enemies did the community have before and for what reasons? Don’t get me wrong. I’m not trying to gain say your statements. I’m just trying to understand the mind set.

  • Pingback: ReCreate Tri-W | The Razor Online