“Reclamator” Man Sues Everybody

Rebuffed by Los Osos and the courts of San Luis Obispo County, urban wastewater cowboy Tom Murphy, proprietor of “The Reclamator” onsite system, is back pawing familiar ground and has turned himself into a perpetual suit-filing machine. His target for the new year: Everybody.

Holed up in Lake Havasu City, Arizona, Murphy has been firing off rounds of lawyerless suits in federal courts against the federal government, the EPA, the State of California, and Lake Havasu City. Filing suits is nothing new for Murphy – it’s always been his calling card — but he may have already played all his cards and used up his suit quota for 2010 just in January and February alone.


On January 29 Murphy had “Consent Judgments” delivered to members of the Lake Havasu City Council, giving them a midnight deadline to accept, sign, notarize, and drop in the mailbox at 1802 Combat Drive in Lake Havasu City. It seems Murphy claims not only to have caught the city red-handed breaking federal water law, but city council members personally violating federal law by polluting as well.

“I am filing against 5 LHC city council members as citizens discharging toxic pollutants from their home, i.e. source,” wrote Murphy “To All” in a January 22 email. “They will have 20 days to decide to agree to a Consent Judgment (I am drawing up now for their acceptance), or, they are in for one big challenge to convince a federal judge they have a right to pollute…oh, not to mention at an estimated cost to retain an attorney to represent them in a federal court will be about $150,000 each.”

Murphy’s filing and court costs? Next to nothing.

On February 4 he launched payback suits against a variety of high-level government officials, including Lake Havasu City council members, Governor Schwarzenegger and Attorney General Brown of California, U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano, USEPA District Administrator Alexis Strauss, the San Luis Obispo judge who heard his case there and dismissed it with prejudice (he still owes $5,000 in court costs), and others who have either previously ruled against him or generally ignored him.

Now the city of Lake Havasu has had just about enough of Dee Thomas Murphy and officials are looking for legal ways to make his stay in Lake Havasu a brief one. That’s won’t be so easy. It seems it’s tough to hold someone accountable in Lake Havasu City if they have no fixed address, own nothing in their own name, and haven’t been charged with any crime they can make stick — yet. At this point, there is nothing the city would rather do than hasten his departure or jail him for abusing the law — as soon as they can figure out exactly which law he is abusing.

Meanwhile, Murphy’s charges are the same as those tossed out by every other court: Failure to obey federal water pollution law which triggers “Murphy’s Law.” Following federal law, he preaches, would pave the way for his exclusive, must-buy, no-questions-asked, souped-up-septic bullet, “The Reclamator.” To freshen his stale brief, Murphy lodged federal R.I.C.O. racketeering charges against the government all-stars for criminal failure to embrace federal law and multiply “The Reclamator.”

Murphy may have had the right idea regarding the need to send a broadside across the bow of corrupt government bureaucracy married to heavy industry (MWH). Yes, greener, cheaper onsite wastewater solutions are currently available that would be a far better fit for coastal, small-town Los Osos than a leaky, big-city raw-sewage pipeline through high groundwater with eventual $400 a month sewer bills.

But Murphy, more than “The Reclamator,” was not up to the task. He is simply the wrong messenger with the wrong motives. Who willingly wants to do business with him? After spending more than a year in Los Osos trying to sell his high-strung waste-to-water machine, Murphy came up bone dry. Not a single customer. Not a single testimonial. He offers no plausible evidence whatsoever of the competency of the man or his machine.

Only what suits him.

— Ed Ochs

  • sam spade

    And yet, your family allowed Murphy to live in your house at 1408 Las Encinas for over a year? Why not come clean about your part in letting this con man hang around LO for so long? Murphy’s website still lists “1408 Las Encinas, Los Osos” as a place to contact him. It took me 2 minutes, and no money, to connect the dots. If you were more honest in your ‘reporting’, you might have more credibility.

    • Ed

      Sam,

      I see how you jammed the few pieces of the puzzle together to make them “fit” your scenario — but your “facts” are wrong, so of course you’re going to come to the wrong conclusion and think it’s right!

      If you were as good a detective as your blog namesake, you would already know that. I love people who connect the dots … that lead to wrong conclusions … that lead to gossip … that MUST be based on some kernel of truth… otherwise people wouldn’t be gossiping about them in the first place, right?!

      Apparently, Sam, you choose to embrace Reillyisms and engage in Kallandomania. That’s too bad. Sorry, there’s no known antidote for those. Unless you know what you’re talking about, if I were you, I wouldn’t talk about it at all. It only shows your ignorance. But that’s OK, I expect nothing more from you so were even.

      Hey, if you’re THAT interested in the real story behind “1408 Las Encinas,” you can read about it my book about Los Osos. It’ll all be there. You won’t have to ask me that question anymore.

      Whether you understand it or not, Sam, I have been as honest as I can possibly be without potentially endangering innocent lives. My credibility is in the hands of my readers and I can live with that, as I have all these years.

      Ed

  • sam spade

    And yet, your family allowed Murphy to live in your house at 1408 Las Encinas for over a year? Why not come clean about your part in letting this con man hang around LO for so long? Murphy’s website still lists “1408 Las Encinas, Los Osos” as a place to contact him. It took me 2 minutes, and no money, to connect the dots. If you were more honest in your ‘reporting’, you might have more credibility.

    • Ed

      Sam,

      I see how you jammed the few pieces of the puzzle together to make them “fit” your scenario — but your “facts” are wrong, so of course you’re going to come to the wrong conclusion and think it’s right!

      If you were as good a detective as your blog namesake, you would already know that. I love people who connect the dots … that lead to wrong conclusions … that lead to gossip … that MUST be based on some kernel of truth… otherwise people wouldn’t be gossiping about them in the first place, right?!

      Apparently, Sam, you choose to embrace Reillyisms and engage in Kallandomania. That’s too bad. Sorry, there’s no known antidote for those. Unless you know what you’re talking about, if I were you, I wouldn’t talk about it at all. It only shows your ignorance. But that’s OK, I expect nothing more from you so were even.

      Hey, if you’re THAT interested in the real story behind “1408 Las Encinas,” you can read about it my book about Los Osos. It’ll all be there. You won’t have to ask me that question anymore.

      Whether you understand it or not, Sam, I have been as honest as I can possibly be without potentially endangering innocent lives. My credibility is in the hands of my readers and I can live with that, as I have all these years.

      Ed

  • sam spade

    Ed-
    I have seen the legal documents (a neighbor had a copy) where you basically ‘sold’ the Las Encinas house to Murphy. You were listed as seller, and Murphy was listed as buyer. Don’t know if any money changed hands, as it was not the usual Deed of Trust transaction. This is all a matter of public record! For you to keep stonewalling is pathetic. Why not man-up and take responsibility for your part in this silliness? And I won’t hold my breath for your ‘book’ to be published.

  • sam spade

    Ed-
    I have seen the legal documents (a neighbor had a copy) where you basically ‘sold’ the Las Encinas house to Murphy. You were listed as seller, and Murphy was listed as buyer. Don’t know if any money changed hands, as it was not the usual Deed of Trust transaction. This is all a matter of public record! For you to keep stonewalling is pathetic. Why not man-up and take responsibility for your part in this silliness? And I won’t hold my breath for your ‘book’ to be published.

  • Ed

    Sam,

    What good are documents if you don’t know how to read them? And you don’t. I would gladly continue this conversation with you if I thought I was talking with someone with some degree of intelligence, at least enough to know that you have made mistake after mistake translating what you acknowledge is “not the usual Deed of Trust transaction.”

    Rather than question your poor spade work, you reveal yourself to be nothing but a spineless fool! You and your gossipy ilk owe my family a public apology — which you don’t have the guts to make. Because you’d rather be wrong than right — and stay wrong — than deal with the facts — of which you enjoy remaining utterly ignorant! You are so addicted to spreading misinformation I don’t think there’s anything I can say that will change the fritzed wiring in your peanut of a brain.

    P.S. Make up what is left of your mind, Sam. You say Murphy lived rent-free … then you say he bought the house. Which one was it? If he bought it why didn’t he sell it? Or did he? Do you know … or imagine you know? Do you really have any idea what you’re talking about? NO. Until you grasp this FACT you are not fit to communicate with honestly and openly, which is my sole purpose for being here, obviously not yours.

    Please: Send me someone else from your tribe to talk to, not you, someone smarter, someone not so enfeebled by hate, someone not so sure they are dead right just in case they happen to be dead wrong.

    When they are.

    Ed

    • sam spade

      I rest my case.

  • Ed

    Sam,

    What good are documents if you don’t know how to read them? And you don’t. I would gladly continue this conversation with you if I thought I was talking with someone with some degree of intelligence, at least enough to know that you have made mistake after mistake translating what you acknowledge is “not the usual Deed of Trust transaction.”

    Rather than question your poor spade work, you reveal yourself to be nothing but a spineless fool! You and your gossipy ilk owe my family a public apology — which you don’t have the guts to make. Because you’d rather be wrong than right — and stay wrong — than deal with the facts — of which you enjoy remaining utterly ignorant! You are so addicted to spreading misinformation I don’t think there’s anything I can say that will change the fritzed wiring in your peanut of a brain.

    P.S. Make up what is left of your mind, Sam. You say Murphy lived rent-free … then you say he bought the house. Which one was it? If he bought it why didn’t he sell it? Or did he? Do you know … or imagine you know? Do you really have any idea what you’re talking about? NO. Until you grasp this FACT you are not fit to communicate with honestly and openly, which is my sole purpose for being here, obviously not yours.

    Please: Send me someone else from your tribe to talk to, not you, someone smarter, someone not so enfeebled by hate, someone not so sure they are dead right just in case they happen to be dead wrong.

    When they are.

    Ed

    • sam spade

      I rest my case.

  • Ed

    Sam,

    By all means give the case you don’t have a rest. The dunce cap fits you as if made for you. Wear it without tripping over it, if you can even do that!!!

    Ed

  • Ed

    Sam,

    By all means give the case you don’t have a rest. The dunce cap fits you as if made for you. Wear it without tripping over it, if you can even do that!!!

    Ed