Comments on: Los Osos: Getting Stronger When Focused

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:11:00 +0000

The “pit” does not go on private property. Why do you keep repeating this? Is it a scare tactic?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:11:00 +0000

The “pit” does not go on private property. Why do you keep repeating this? Is it a scare tactic?

By: Sewertoons

Sewertoons — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 06:31:00 +0000

Of course it will work for the whole town, but do you want to pay for it? To avoid the hassles of “who gets the pit,” each house would need one – and there go your cost savings.

By: Sewertoons

Sewertoons — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 06:31:00 +0000

Of course it will work for the whole town, but do you want to pay for it? To avoid the hassles of “who gets the pit,” each house would need one – and there go your cost savings.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 02:39:00 +0000

Many of the vacuum systems are installed in areas where no other system would work. This is why we are getting a Hybrid system with some vacuum. No other system will work in parts of Los Osos. This does not mean that it will not work for the whole town.

Pandora and neighbors will be getting vacuum regardless.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 02:39:00 +0000

By: Sewertoons

Sewertoons — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:14:00 +0000

Hooper, Utah is flat as well.

By: Sewertoons

Sewertoons — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:14:00 +0000

Hooper, Utah is flat as well.

By: Sewertoons

Sewertoons — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:08:00 +0000

Vacuum was evaluated in the Rough Screening Report, pages 6-7 to 6-9. It did not make it into the Fine Screening Report on its own as there was no advantage to it on its own. It can be used combined with gravity which is where it makes sense.

Do you own a house? Do you want to share maintenance costs with your neighbors? If one neighbor continually clogs the system, do you want to pay for this? Air-Vac says between 2 to 4 homes per pit, but an example in the Rough Screening shows 5 to 7 houses per pit. It will need to be located on private property. Which house is the lucky house to get the pit? Draw straws?

Your examples are nice, but appear to be puff pieces written by Air-Vac as a compensation for advertising in the publication they appear in or were written for the Air-Vac website. Flat terrain that has no "gravity" or bedrock and large trees hardly characterize Los Osos, but obviously would seem an appropriate fit for Virginia Beach, VA and Forest, Ohio.

There was no "fear" to evaluating vacuum systems. It was evaluated and sank on its own.

By: Sewertoons

Sewertoons — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:08:00 +0000

Vacuum was evaluated in the Rough Screening Report, pages 6-7 to 6-9. It did not make it into the Fine Screening Report on its own as there was no advantage to it on its own. It can be used combined with gravity which is where it makes sense.Do you own a house? Do you want to share maintenance costs with your neighbors? If one neighbor continually clogs the system, do you want to pay for this? Air-Vac says between 2 to 4 homes per pit, but an example in the Rough Screening shows 5 to 7 houses per pit. It will need to be located on private property. Which house is the lucky house to get the pit? Draw straws?Your examples are nice, but appear to be puff pieces written by Air-Vac as a compensation for advertising in the publication they appear in or were written for the Air-Vac website. Flat terrain that has no “gravity” or bedrock and large trees hardly characterize Los Osos, but obviously would seem an appropriate fit for Virginia Beach, VA and Forest, Ohio.There was no “fear” to evaluating vacuum systems. It was evaluated and sank on its own.