Best of the Coast

VisionBedding May Deal

Coastal Commission Staff Requests Denial of PG&E Permit

In their November 2 report, California Coastal Commission staff are requesting a denial and objection of Pacific Gas and Electric’s Combined Consistency Certification and Coastal Development Permit application. The application is for the first phase of a proposed two-phase series of Central Coast Seismic Imaging Project, which would use acoustic pulse-generating air guns to study active faults adjacent to the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant. The project was reduced in scope to cover Zone 4, which is 1.4 miles off the coast of Morro Bay.

The Coastal Commission is hearing PG&E’s request for a permit on Nov. 14 in Santa Monica.

Commission staff wrote: “The key Coastal Act issue of concern is this project’s significant and unavoidable impacts to marine resources. Seismic surveys are among the very loudest anthropogenic underwater sound sources and can cause disturbance, injury, and loss of a large number of marine species due to air gun noise.

“Even with extensive monitoring, and implementation of measures to minimize impacts, the Commission staff believes this project would still result in significant disturbance, injury and loss of marine biological resources and is therefore inconsistent with the Coastal Act’s marine resource protection policies (Sections 30230 and 30231).” The project does qualify for an “override” of the act if PG&E satisfied the following conditions: (1) alternative locations are infeasible or more environmentally damaging; (2) to do otherwise would adversely affect the public welfare; and (3) adverse environmental effects are mitigated to the maximum extent feasible.”

However, Commission staff concluded that PG&E was not able to meet the first condition. They stated that there is “insufficient information to determine that alternative locations are infeasible or more environmentally damaging.”

“Because applying Section 30260 [the "override" policy] requires that a proposed project meet all three tests in order to be approved, if the project fails to meet the first test there is no need for the Commission to apply the two remaining tests.”

Commission staff recommended additional analysis of all available data using updated techniques, which they say “may result in the opportunity for a smaller or shorter proposed survey.”

COMMENTS

Our comment policy is simple: be polite and fair. Imagine you're having a casual conversation with someone in person. Please refrain from abusive and derogatory comments! If your comments are good enough, we'll feature them on our Facebook page!

2 comments
JoeyRacano
JoeyRacano

But it's not coastal dependent. They are only on the coast because they have a waiver (316b) waiver from the Clean Water Act, which allows them to suck in seawater with their cooling intake and dump it back out above ambient temperature. This results in destruction of larvae by the billions, and if the plant loses the waiver, they are no longer on the earthquake faults or the coast. This is not a coastal dependent industrial development. Just an industrial development in the wrong place. They should move inland and upgrade to a cooling tower configuration instead. There's a good use for the 64 million dollars.On facebook: Stop the Diablo Canyon Seismic Testing

TheROCKSLO
TheROCKSLO moderator

 @JoeyRacano Do you believe that the Coastal Commission is not aware of the Clean Water Act 316b waiver?

Adsense